I’m a 21-year-old female and I
know the my-boyfriend-has-a-diaper-fetish thing has been done to death.
But…
We’ve been together for two years. When he
mustered up the courage to tell me about his fetish, I was supportive
even though it did seem odd. To be completely honest, he’s so good
looking and such a wonderful guy that I was worried about losing him if
I seemed less than ecstatic.
Flash forward a year and a half. We’re very
close, we’re in a really good place, and we want to get married.
However, his fetish has started to bother me. In the beginning he
wanted me to talk down to him, he’d come in his diaper, and we were
done. We’d do that roughly once a week. Now it’s all he ever wants to
do and “normal” sex is off the menu. And his fetish has progressed to
these elaborate role-play scenarios complete with...
...were
done. We’d do that roughly once a week. Now it’s all he ever wants to
do and “normal” sex is off the menu. And his fetish has progressed to
these elaborate role-play scenarios complete with “sissy outfits.”
Sometimes it takes a whole day of role-playing to satisfy him and he
makes me feel guilty if I refuse.
I know he’s attracted to me—my
attractiveness is a significant part of the role-playing—but I
feel like he’s being selfish. I also don’t want him to do what I want
just for the sake of doing what I want. I’m getting sick of this inner
dialogue. What do you think? And please don’t pass me up because you’ve
answered infantilism questions in the past.
Sick Of Diapered Sissy
You’re right, SODS—we have done the
boyfriend-has-a-diaper-fetish thing to death. In fact, I responded to a
woman who signed herself Beyond Annoyed in February; she was married to
a diaper-loving adult baby who was neglecting her desire for vanilla
sex. Now normally I wouldn’t run a letter from a reader with an
identical problem, SODS, but I’m going to make an exception in your
case. No need to thank me.
Thank O. J. Wandrisco.
Wandrisco is the director of a Christian
youth group in Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania, and to “break the ice” at a
recent meeting, Mr. Wandrisco sent three teenage boys—14-year-old
boys—into a restroom with an older teenager. The boys were given
“adult diapers, bibs, and bonnets and directed to take their clothes
off and put the diapers, bibs, and bonnets on,” the Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette reported. “The boys returned to the group, where they
were asked to sit in the laps of three girls. The girls spoon-fed baby
food to the boys and then gave them baby bottles filled with soda pop.
The first boy to finish was the winner.”
Putting horny 14-year-old boys in diapers
and plopping them on the laps of teenage girls for a little spoon- and
bottle-feeding—thus are lifelong fetishes born. Not that I have
anything against fetishes, lifelong or temporary, or the kind of
formative life experiences that create ’em. I live in the house that
fetishes bought, after all. But can you imagine the uproar from
Christian groups if a gay youth group employed similar ice-breaking
techniques?
A spokesman for the Christian youth group
told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that they’ve been doing this
“skit” for years; they also do a “skit” where girls eat chocolate
pudding out of adult diapers. The spokesman also insisted that the boys
from Mt. Lebanon “had fun” in those diapers. I’ll bet they
did—and odds are good that they’re going to be having fun in
diapers for the rest of their lives.
Okay, SODS, here’s the advice I offered
Beyond Annoyed: “Cut the brat off—no more baby games until he can
successfully wrap his bonnet around this: Your pleasure matters as much
as his does. He may not be interested in regular sex, but he needs to
learn to fake it convincingly. And finally, BA, tell him that his
continued failure to meet your vanilla needs is gonna get his diapered
ass [dumped], leaving him single and shit out of luck,
sex-partner-wise, for the rest of his adult infancy.”
I frequently caution vanilla types not to
leave folks on account of their kinks. “Dump the honest foot
fetishist,” goes the Karmic Rule of Kink (KROK), “and you will marry
the dishonest necrophiliac.” So good on you, SODS, for the way you
handled your boyfriend’s revelation. But KROK applies to kinksters,
too: A lucky kinkster with an indulgent vanilla partner who fails to
joyfully accommodate his partner’s desire for “normal” sex is gonna get
his ass dumped and then he’s NEVER gonna get his kinky rocks off again
without having to pay a pro $500 an hour to put up with his
bullshit.
Of course, your boyfriend may not believe
that he’s neglecting your needs. Concerned about seeming “less than
ecstatic” when he broke the news, since he’s so good looking you were
afraid of losing him, your feigned enthusiasm may have led him to
believe that you find his kink just as exciting as he does. If that’s
the case, you’re going to have to take it back without making him feel
violated. So when you cut him off, SODS, tell him that neither of you
will be enjoying his kinks until vanilla sex is back on the menu.
I am a 26-year-old gay man living in
Boston. I recently started dating a man in his 30s whose biggest
turn-on is having a guy lick and kiss the bottoms of his feet. At first
I enjoyed watching him get so much satisfaction while I licked and
kissed his feet. But now I’m feeling uneasy. He has started asking me
to get naked and worship his feet while he remains clothed and engages
in nonsexual activities—things like watching TV, eating dinner,
or just sitting back and having a smoke. I’m concerned that he’s
degrading me. I do have to say he more than gets me off after I do this
for him. But I don’t want to be in a relationship based on my being
degraded—as good as it may feel to both of us.
Do I put up with feeling degraded and stick
around for the great sex? Do I tell him how I’m
feeling?
New Foot Licker
His biggest turn-on is having his feet
“worshipped,” he wants you to worship said feet while he ignores you,
and he remains fully clothed while you slobber away bare-ass
naked—uh, NFL? This scenario is all about degradation, about you
debasing yourself to affirm his sexual dominance. So long as he’s only
interested in degrading you when you’re having sex, NFL, and not
interested in degrading or dominating you 24/7, then you’re not in a
relationship “based on [your] being degraded,” but in a relationship
with someone turned on by role-playing degradation scenarios.
Does his desire to have you worship his feet
while he engages in nonsexual activities—TV, meals,
smokes—represent outside-of-sex slippage? Not so long as hot sex
follows your degradation, NFL. You see, your slobbering and your nudity
transform whatever “nonsexual activities” he’s engaging in—or
pretending to engage
in—into highly charged sexual
activities. When you’re not naked on the floor licking the bottoms of
his feet, NFL, then watching TV is just watching TV. But when you are
on the floor licking the bottoms of his feet, watching TV is
foreplay.
Finally, NFL, of course you should tell him
how you’re feeling. You should also ask him where, if anywhere, this is
going. Is this scenario—you completely nude, worshipping his feet
while he, fully clothed, ignores you—the end point? Is it his
ultimate turn-on? Or is he grooming you for more degrading tasks? But
first ask yourself this: “What if his answer is yes?”
Download Savage Lovecast (my weekly
podcast) every Tuesday at www.thestranger.com/savage.
[email protected]