Open marriages—do they
ever work?
After 16 years and one kid, my husband and I
are considering an open marriage. Over a year ago, I met another man
who I was attracted to and wanted to fuck. I had met men like this
throughout our marriage, but never did anything because I was married
and respectful of the monogamous relationship we had. I would just
bring that “crush” energy home and take it out on my husband. Our sex
life has always been okay, nothing mind blowing, but steady.
Well, we hit the inevitable rut that couples
sometimes get into and I was bored and frustrated and wanted more than
my husband was giving me. I asked, but he just wasn’t interested in
exploring anything more than the vanilla sex we were already having. I
gently tried toys, porn, going out to bars and checking out others for
three-ways. He wasn’t...
...
exploring anything more than the vanilla sex we were already having. I
gently tried toys, porn, going out to bars and checking out others for
three-ways. He wasn’t interested. So I made peace with the fact that I
was stuck with a vanilla guy and just focused on the other parts that
worked—good partner, good man, steady guy. A little boring, but
better than a drama freak.
Then about a year ago, I met someone who
turned from a friendship into a strong attraction. Instead of having an
affair, I told my husband that I wanted to be able to pursue sex with
this person since I wasn’t getting what I wanted at home. Husband got
pissed and said no way (no surprise), but that if I did do anything, he
didn’t want to know about it. Don’t ask, don’t tell. I didn’t do
anything out of respect for him, but it made me resentful. So I decided
to ask for a divorce before entering into an affair, and about five
months ago my husband and I separated. I have been seeing the other man
during this time and the sex has been amazing—he’s doing the
things that I begged my husband to do with me. My husband has been
miserable without me and has agreed to an open marriage so we can still
be together, be a family, and I can be free to have an outside
relationship. My husband is also free to have an outside relationship.
He now accepts that I’ve been with another man (whom he has met) and
that I am capable of loving him as a husband while having a sexual
relationship on the side.
This has been a long letter, I realize, but
all I want to know is if this is a recipe for disaster. Am I fooling
myself about the reality of opening a marriage up to include outside
lovers? Does it only sound good in theory?
Trying To Find Happiness
Open marriages work, TTFH, but only
sometimes—just like, um, what are those other things that only
work sometimes called again? Oh, right: closed marriages. Will your
open marriage work? I couldn’t tell you. But your closed marriage
definitely wasn’t working. You were no longer willing to settle for the
sex life you shared with your husband and were headed for divorce. Then
your husband concluded that being together and being a family was more
important to him than being sexually exclusive. And so you’re back
together—for now.
Will it work out in the long run? Only if
you keep those lines of communication open, treat each other with love
and respect, and make sure that, emotionally if not sexually, you are
each other’s top priority. And if your open marriage doesn’t work out,
what’s the worst that can happen? You wind up getting a
divorce—which you were about to do anyway. So I wouldn’t say that
openness is a threat to your marriage. I’d say it’s your marriage’s
last chance.
I just started dating a great girl
who is significantly younger than me. I’m 35 and she’s 20. As a
longtime reader, I know and agree with your “campsite rule” about
having sex with younger people: I have a responsibility to leave her in
better shape than I found her. Part of that is easy—be honest,
caring, open, GGG, etc.—but I would like to humbly request that
you ask your readers who have been in relationships with a large age
gap what their partners did for them that left them better off? Or
worse off? Love the column and podcast!
One
Less Douche
Honoring my campsite rule doesn’t merely
require that you be honest, caring, open, and GGG, OLD. It also means
that you do all you can to make sure this young woman emerges from this
relationship with no STIs, no fertilized eggs, no restraining orders,
no emotional trauma, and with improved sexual skills.
To aid you in doing that, I’m happy to
invite readers to serve up specific, real-life examples of older
partners honoring the campsite rule. Were you once involved with a
significantly older partner? Please write in and let us know what your
older partner did right—or wrong.
I’m a loyal fan and a physician who
cares for people living with HIV. I was reading a column from a few
months back and appreciated your candid response to an HIV-negative man
who was embarking on a new sexual relationship with a known
HIV-positive man.
However, I would have hoped that you would
touch upon what a guy should do if a condom DOES break. According to
CDC guidelines, if a person receives HIV medicine within 72 hours of a
condom breaking or another “exposure,” there is evidence that you can
actually prevent HIV infection. Of course, these medicines have to be
taken for 28 days, have lots of side effects, and are not always
effective. I would never promote unprotected sex with the idea that you
could just take the medicines afterward and have no worries. The
medical world has termed this “postexposure prophylaxis.” It has been
the standard of care since January 2005.
I was just hoping that you would share this
with your readers. From the number of patients I continue to see, I am
unsure if this is public knowledge.
Pittsburgh
Doctor
Thanks for sharing, PD.
NOW FOR A LITTLE SEX-POSITIVE JOURNALISM:
Recently, the sex-negative journalism of Kandiss Crone of WLBT News in
Jackson, Mississippi, annoyed me so much that I urged readers to send
Crone angry e-mails and, er, used sex toys. Perhaps I went a little
overboard. Crone isn’t the only “journalist” out there doing idiotic,
sex-negative work. Fact is, most of what gets written and published
about sex is negative and sensationalistic.
This sad state of affairs inspired the
National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, the Center for Sex &
Culture, Babeland, and journalist Miriam Axel-Lute to launch the
Sex-Positive Journalism Awards. By drawing attention to good,
sex-positive reporting, the “Sexies” hope to promote fair, accurate,
and nonsensationalized coverage of sexual topics.
“The fact that sex-positive journalism is so
rare means we need the help of all of you readers out there to help us
turn up those gems of good, objective, sex-positive reporting,” says
Axel-Lute. “Especially in mainstream sources.” I’m proud to have been
asked to serve as a judge for the first annual Sex-Positive Journalism
Awards. The deadline for submissions for the first annual “Sexies” is
March 23, 2008. (The piece must have been published during 2007.)
Anyone can submit a piece for consideration at the “Sexies” website:
www.sexies.org.
Download Savage Lovecast (my weekly
podcast) every Tuesday at www.thestranger.com/savage.
[email protected]